
Zero Dark Thirty Controversy: Mark Boal, Mark Bowden This Week Interview…
Amid controversy surrounding its depiction of the CIA’s use of “enhanced interrogation techniques” during the nearly decade-long pursuit of Osama bin Laden, Mark Boal, the screenwriter of Kathryn Bigelow’s Zero Dark Thirty, appeared on ABC News’ This Week on January 27, 2013. In an interview conducted by Martha Raddatz, who was filling in for George Stephanopoulos, Boal discussed the film’s controversial portrayal of interrogation methods.










Joining Boal in the discussion is journalist Mark Bowden, author of Black Hawk Down and The Finish: The Killing of Osama bin Laden. Bowden offers a balanced perspective on the controversy, particularly regarding the portrayal of enhanced interrogation techniques and the debate over whether Zero Dark Thirty serves as a journalistic account of those events. Having also witnessed his own work adapted for the screen in the film Black Hawk Down, Bowden brings valuable insight into the challenges of translating historical military events into Hollywood narratives.







The controversy intensified when Senators Dianne Feinstein, John McCain, and Carl Levin sent a letter to Sony Pictures condemning Zero Dark Thirty for its portrayal—and apparent endorsement—of torture as an investigative tool used by the CIA. This letter, amplified by backlash from other conservative figures in government amid an election year, prompted the Senate Intelligence Committee, led by co-chair Feinstein, to launch an investigation into the CIA’s use of torture—a move directly influenced by the film’s depiction of interrogation methods.






![The Committee Study of the Central Intelligence Agency's Detention and Interrogation Program[1] is a report compiled by the bipartisan United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) about the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)'s Detention and Interrogation Program and its use of torture during interrogation in U.S. government communiqués on detainees in CIA custody. The report covers CIA activities before, during, and after the "War on Terror." The initial report was approved on December 13, 2012, by a vote of 9–6, with seven Democrats, one independent, and one Republican voting in favor of the report and six Republicans voting in opposition.[2][3] The more-than 6,700-page report (including 38,000 footnotes)[4] details the history of the CIA's Detention and Interrogation Program and the Committee's 20 findings and conclusions. On December 9, 2014, the SSCI released a 525-page portion that consisted of key findings and an executive summary of the full report. It took more than five years to complete.[5][6] The full unredacted report remains classified.[7][8][9] The report details actions by CIA officials, including torturing prisoners, providing misleading or false information about classified CIA programs to the president, Department of Justice, Congress, and the media, impeding government oversight and internal criticism, and mismanaging the program. It also revealed the existence of previously unknown detainees, that more detainees were subjected to "enhanced interrogation techniques" (widely understood to be a euphemism for torture) than was previously disclosed, and that more techniques were used without Department of Justice approval. It concluded that the use of enhanced interrogation techniques did not yield unique intelligence that saved lives (as the CIA claimed), nor was it useful in gaining cooperation from detainees, and that the program damaged the United States' international standing.[1] Some people, including some CIA officials and U.S. Republicans, disputed the report's conclusions and said it provided an incomplete picture of the program. Others criticized the publishing of the report, citing its potential for damage to the U.S. and the contentious history of its development. Former Republican presidential nominee John McCain praised the release of the report. Upon the report’s release, then-President Barack Obama stated, "One of the strengths that makes America exceptional is our willingness to openly confront our past, face our imperfections, make changes and do better."[10] In the wake of the release of the report's executive summary, a large number of individuals and organizations called for the prosecution of the CIA and government officials who perpetrated, approved, or provided legal cover for the torture of detainees;[11][12][13][14][15] however, prosecutions are considered unlikely.[16] The U.S. has also passed legislation, sponsored by Senators McCain and Dianne Feinstein, to prevent U.S. agencies from using many of the torture techniques described in the report.[17] The 2019 film The Report covers the decade-long time period that led to the final creation and publication of the report.](https://i0.wp.com/moviestohistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/The-Senate-Intelligence-Committee-Report-on-CIA-Torture--791x1024.webp?ssl=1)
Below is the full interview with Raddatz, Boal, and Bowden, where you can decide for yourself whether Zero Dark Thirty endorses interrogation techniques or instead raises difficult questions about the moral gray areas in which the government has operated—particularly during the early days of the search for bin Laden.





Boal also highlights concerns about government interference in the screenwriting process when dramatizing events from military or broader historical narratives. He draws a parallel to the 1940s and the era of McCarthyism, noting the climate of fear that writers in Hollywood faced when tackling controversial subjects—such as the manhunt for Osama bin Laden or the events depicted in Black Hawk Down.





Watch the full interview with Raddatz, Boal, and Bowden below:

Zero Dark Thirty is available now with a subscription to Peacock…
