---

---

The assassination of James A. Garfield is one of the most consequential yet strangely overlooked events in American political history. When people discuss presidential assassinations, the names that typically dominate the conversation are Abraham Lincoln, John F. Kennedy, and sometimes William McKinley. Garfield’s assassination, however, rarely receives the same attention despite its enormous impact on American government reform.

Yet Garfield’s death in 1881 reshaped the federal government, accelerated civil service reform, and exposed dangerous flaws in both American politics and nineteenth-century medicine. The man who shot him, Charles J. Guiteau, was not merely a disgruntled citizen but a product of a deeply corrupt political system that rewarded loyalty with government jobs.

More disturbingly, Garfield did not die immediately from the gunshot wound. Instead, he lingered for 79 agonizing days, his condition worsened by doctors whose treatments likely doomed him. In this sense, Garfield’s assassination is not simply a story of political violence — it is also a story of delusion, entitlement, and medical catastrophe.

Understanding what happened to Garfield helps illuminate how America transitioned from patronage politics toward a more professional civil service system.

Garfield’s Presidency: Reform, Not Stagnation

---

When James Garfield assumed the presidency in March 1881, the United States was still grappling with the political aftermath of the Civil War and Reconstruction. Garfield was not a career politician in the traditional sense. His background was remarkably diverse: he had been a teacher, a college president, a Union general during the Civil War, and a longtime member of Congress.

Garfield entered office at a time when American politics was dominated by factionalism within the Republican Party. Two major factions — the Stalwarts and the Half-Breeds — fought bitterly over control of federal patronage jobs. These jobs were distributed through what was known as the spoils system, a practice that rewarded political supporters with government positions regardless of merit.

Garfield attempted to chart a middle path between these factions while also challenging the entrenched patronage culture. His reformist instincts were particularly visible in a conflict over the powerful New York Customs House, which controlled a significant portion of federal patronage jobs.

Garfield nominated William H. Robertson to lead the customs office in New York, angering powerful political boss Roscoe Conkling, who had long controlled those appointments. The conflict escalated into a dramatic political showdown that forced Conkling to resign from the Senate in protest.

This confrontation revealed Garfield’s willingness to challenge the patronage machine. In other words, Garfield’s presidency was not one of passive stewardship — it was one that threatened entrenched political interests.

Ironically, it was precisely this patronage culture that would contribute to the circumstances surrounding his assassination.

Charles Guiteau: Delusion vs. Intent

---

The man who shot President Garfield, Charles Guiteau, was not a political conspirator or revolutionary. Instead, he was an unstable and deeply delusional individual who believed he deserved a diplomatic appointment for helping Garfield win the presidency.

Guiteau had spent years drifting between failed careers. He had attempted to become a lawyer, a preacher, and a political activist, but none of these pursuits succeeded. At one point he joined the utopian religious community led by John Humphrey Noyes, though he was eventually expelled for disruptive behavior.

In the 1880 presidential campaign, Guiteau wrote a speech titled “Garfield vs. Hancock.” Though he delivered it only a handful of times, he convinced himself that it had been instrumental in Garfield’s victory over Democratic candidate Winfield Scott Hancock.

Because of this imagined contribution, Guiteau believed Garfield owed him a diplomatic post — specifically the position of U.S. consul in Paris.

For months, Guiteau visited the State Department and the White House repeatedly, demanding the appointment. Officials, including Secretary of State James G. Blaine, eventually dismissed him outright. Blaine reportedly told him never to return.

Guiteau interpreted this rejection not as a bureaucratic dismissal but as a betrayal of divine destiny. He convinced himself that God had ordered him to remove Garfield from office.

On July 2, 1881, Guiteau approached Garfield at the Baltimore and Potomac Railroad Station in Washington, D.C. As the president prepared to depart for a summer vacation, Guiteau fired two shots from a revolver. One bullet grazed Garfield’s arm. The other lodged deep in his back.

Garfield did not die that day. But the ordeal that followed would prove fatal.

The Spoils System and Political Entitlement

---

To understand Guiteau’s motives, it is essential to understand the political culture of the Gilded Age.

The spoils system — popularized during the presidency of Andrew Jackson—treated government positions as rewards for political loyalty. Campaign supporters expected appointments as compensation for their efforts.

By the late nineteenth century, this system had created an environment where thousands of job seekers flooded Washington after every election. Guiteau was not unique in believing he deserved a government position. What made him unusual was the extremity of his entitlement.

In his mind, Garfield’s refusal to grant him a diplomatic post was not merely disappointing — it was unjust. He interpreted political patronage as a personal right rather than a privilege.

In court, Guiteau famously insisted:

“I did not kill the President. The doctors killed him.”

This statement, though self-serving, reflected an unsettling truth. Garfield might have survived the attack if not for what happened next.

How Medical Malpractice Prolonged Garfield’s Death

---

After the shooting, Garfield was treated by a team of physicians led by Willard Bliss. Unfortunately, nineteenth-century medical practices — and Bliss’s stubborn leadership — likely turned a survivable wound into a fatal one. The bullet lodged behind Garfield’s pancreas but did not immediately threaten vital organs. Modern medical analysis suggests that the wound itself was not necessarily fatal.

The real danger came from infection.

Doctors repeatedly inserted unsterilized fingers and instruments into Garfield’s wound while attempting to locate the bullet. This occurred at a time when the germ theory of disease — pioneered by Louis Pasteur and Joseph Lister — was gaining acceptance in Europe but had not yet been widely adopted in the United States.

As a result, Garfield developed severe infections that spread throughout his body.

In a desperate attempt to locate the bullet, inventor Alexander Graham Bell constructed an early metal detector. Unfortunately, the device failed to locate the bullet, partly because Garfield lay on a mattress with metal springs that interfered with the signal.

Over the following weeks, Garfield endured fever, extreme weight loss, and repeated surgical interventions. By September 1881, his body was weakened beyond recovery. He died on September 19, 1881, seventy-nine days after the shooting. Guiteau’s claim that doctors had killed the president was not entirely wrong.

Modern historians and physicians widely agree that Garfield likely would have survived if treated with sterile techniques.

Why Garfield’s Assassination Still Matters

---

Garfield’s death shocked the nation and triggered a long-delayed political reckoning.

The tragedy helped galvanize support for civil service reform, culminating in the Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act, which established merit-based hiring for many federal jobs. The law significantly reduced the influence of patronage politics.

Garfield’s assassination also exposed how dangerous the spoils system had become. Political entitlement had produced an environment where unstable individuals believed they were owed positions of power.

Finally, Garfield’s death remains a cautionary tale about the evolution of modern medicine. The case is frequently cited in medical history as an example of how pre-antiseptic practices could turn survivable injuries into fatal infections.

In the end, Garfield’s assassination represents a convergence of three forces:

Together, they produced one of the most tragic — and preventable — presidential deaths in American history. Garfield’s presidency lasted only 200 days, but the reforms that followed reshaped the federal government for generations.

His assassination may be forgotten by many Americans today, but its consequences continue to shape the way government works.

Death by Lightning is available now with a subscription to Netflix…